Der Ring des Nibelungen, Aug. 1986
The first event, affecting all four operas, took place six months
before. In December of 1985, I received a call from Armin Jordan telling
me that he could not return to Seattle to conduct. He had severe back
problems, and he couldn’t make the flight. If he came by boat and train,
he still wouldn’t have been able to conduct. So only six months before
the cycle began, I had no conductor. In September of that year, we had
presented a new production of Massenet’s Manon, a first for Carol Vaness
in the title role. The octogenarian, Manuel Rosenthal, once music
director of Seattle Symphony, returned for the first time since 1950 to
lead the work. While he was here, he told me that he had always wanted
to conduct the Ring, but “no one would ever ask me to do it.” Confronted
the disaster of Jordan’s cancellation, and knowing that Rosenthal was
both a composer and a brilliant conductor, I called him in Paris. He was
eating dinner. I asked him to conduct our Ring that summer, and there
was a pause. He said, “Wait a minute.” A few seconds later he came on
again and said, “Yes. I will do it.” Again my own inexperience allowed
me to make such a choice. Rosenthal had conducted Walküre, maybe only
Act I, in concert. In December I was asking him to learn the entire
cycle by June, when rehearsals were to begin. For a musician of any age,
such a request was simply ridiculous. To prepare the cycle takes at
least a year of thinking, and a lot of preparation. And Rosenthal was in
his early 80s. Yet when the conductor came to Seattle that June, he was
totally prepared, not only prepared but with a personal interpretation
of the Ring that was remarkable. He conducted two great cycles,
memorable as much for their orchestral quality as for what happened
onstage. I am happy to say that at the time of this writing, February
2003, Maestro Rosenthal is 98 years old, still in good health, and
living in Paris.
[Editor's note: Maestro Rosenthal passed away on June 5, 2003, less than two weeks short of his 99th birthday.]
DAS RHEINGOLD, August 1986
In this first cycle of the Rochaix-Israel Ring, Das Rheingold was a
notable success. The first night it was greeted with enthusiastic
applause, an event which happened in all ten repetitions of the work at
Seattle Opera. The opening performance had one of the most terrifying
events in my 19 years at the Opera. In the opening scene, the stage was
covered by a blue, opaque, and shiny material. It covered props for
later scenes, which, because they were covered, suggested rocky
elevations in a river bed. It was slick to walk on, and the idea was
that the Rhine Daughters could easily run on it while Alberich slipped,
stumbled, and fell wherever he moved. At the end of the scene, after he
had taken the gold, the scene went dark, and the blue material was flown
into the flies, revealing the second scene on which Wotan and Fricka
were asleep. The time it took to fly the material was roughly the time
of the interlude. It should have moved out of sight at about the time
the trombones and tubas state the Valhalla theme, and the second scene
is about to begin.
On this first night, it rose beautifully. About six feet off the stage,
it stopped. It was caught on a corner of the large piece of scenery
which stood some 25 feet high and from which the gods eventually would
start toward Valhalla. It stuck and continued to stick despite gentle
and not-so-gentle tugs. The music played. Israel, Rochaix and I, sitting
in different parts of the house, all froze in our seats. There was
literally nothing we could do. The music played on. Maestro Rosenthal of
course knew what had happened but kept playing. He had decided, he
afterwards told me, that he would stop the orchestra just before Fricka
was supposed to sing. Just at the moment the Valhalla motif was
sounding, I saw a shadow go up the ladder on the large piece of scenery.
The shadow disappeared at the top, but suddenly the blue material
started to move. True, Fricka and Wotan began the scene with the blue
still visible, but it was clearing fast. The man responsible for this
heroic act lay flat on the top of the piece of scenery throughout the 45
minutes of scene two, only descending after the set piece was moved
offstage for the Nibelheim scene. He was the prop master, Peter Olds,
and I told him that night—and meant it—that as long as I am general
director of Seattle Opera he has a job. He still is Prop master and a
superb one at that.
DIE WALKÜRE, August 1986
The shock of this performance was its acceptance by the audience. No one
booed. All the clamor of the year before had vanished. Even the Ring
audience, classically silent when the orchestra is playing, applauded
the flying horses, and everyone seemed now, if not to understand, at
least to accept Wotan’s attic. The changes in the production were
important: Bambi was gone; the floral area where Siegmund and Sieglinde
found love had a lot more flowers and plants and really looked
springlike. The tower in Act II, a bona fide copy of the kind of tower
used in the nineteenth century to raise and lower singers onstage, now
had a new painting on its stage front that suggested more the
mountainous terrain where the act is set. In Wotan’s attic, since we
knew exactly what Brünnhilde’s sarcophagus in which she sleeps in
Siegfried would be, she lay on a structure which suggested the
sarcophagus’s being built. The flames were more imposing. More than a
few people had complained bitterly that despite the fact that we used
real flame at the end—something no company did at the time—there was not
enough of it, nor was it scary. Linda Kelm, Brünnhilde, and Johanna
Meier, the Sieglinde, sang wonderfully as did Roloff. A newcomer to the
cast, Warren Ellsworth as Siegmund made quite an impression. I also
remember Maestro Rosenthal’s saying in rehearsal at the beginning of Act
III just before the Valkyries flew on, “Now, we go to the circus.”
SIEGFRIED, August 1986
A never-to-be forgotten night, a night when I really wondered if this
Ring would ever work. It began in Act I, very conventional in look and
superbly sung by Ed Sooter, our Siegfried, and Hubert Delamboye, the
Mime (on his way to take on a major career in heldentenor roles in
Europe). Before the performance, in an insanely stupid moment, I had
told the critic of the New York Times that we had a fool-proof anvil.
Traditionally, the splitting of the anvil by Siegfried at the end of the
act is a big problem. Either it doesn’t split because he hits the wrong
place on the anvil with his sword, or it opens too early. Long before
the crucial moment on this occasion, when he was sharpening the sword,
the anvil obviously opened. Sooter held it together until he could make
a pass at it with the sword, but the nature of raising the sword and
swinging it made it open long before he hit it. In that act, we
introduced the first of four small bears that the different Siegfrieds
over the 11 years of this Ring would lead out of the forest. Each was
very popular with the audience, but as the years went on, more and more
animal activists wildly protested the use of the bear. All my reports on
the condition of our bears, born in captivity, never mistreated, and
acclimated to Wagner’s music so that it would not be a shock in
performance, never stopped the complaints.
This season I had believed in my innocence that we could prepare three
Ring operas and give them their premiere all at once. The Wagner
Festival in Bayreuth does this (in fact it presents all four new the
first time), but a century of experience, a total concentration on a new
Ring and months of rehearsals allows this to happen. In our case, we
were not staffed to accomplish the feat. When we were planning this
Ring, I had said to Rochaix and Israel that I wanted the dragon really
to frighten the audience (an absurd idea in the age of Hollywood and the
post-Walt Disney era). I thought that if the dragon were larger than the
opera house and that we saw only its claws, it might really be
frightening. They agreed, and Israel designed huge claws that would come
at Siegfried. We never really had the rehearsal time necessary to make
the claws work properly, and on opening night they were risible. The
audience did laugh, and almost immediately afterwards they were dubbed
“crab legs.” What was assumed by us but lost to the audience was that if
Fafner were wounded at all, he would die. Nothung, Siegfried’s sword,
need not go into his heart. This bit of fairy-tale subtlety didn’t read.
And at the end of the opera, there was joy and play by Siegfried and
Brünnhilde. They literally seemed to be ready to make love and hid under
a huge available canvas. This was much too much for many Wagnerians who
see the two as dramatic figures, incapable of such innocent play.
The production was thunderously booed. Many again applauded, but the
boos were huge. I was worried.
GÖTTERDÄMMERUNG, August 1986
The audience, somewhat angry at Siegfried, came to Götterdämmerung with
a chip on their collective shoulders, or, at least, that’s how I saw
them. I was delighted when the whole mood changed. They adored the first
two acts. The black columns suggesting the hall of the Gibichungs were
properly ominous; the use of Brünnhilde’s sarcophagus, which they had
seen the night before, delighted them. And they were properly
appreciative of the amazing work of the crew in quietly and efficiently
changing all the scenes in full view.
Act III began well. Rochaix had an idea that the Rhine Daughters would
carry the river with them. Each had a long swath of the same material
that we had seen at the beginning of Das Rheingold, and they would
enact, as they sang, a kind of choreography with the material. They
would at times drape the long pieces into a kind of Rhine. Siegfried
would jump the created “river.” They would also surround themselves with
the cloth when appropriate so that they looked like prophetesses. It was
very effective, and the audience loved it.
Then came the final scene. I have since learned that any Ring audience
will forgive you much if you present them with a great final scene. If
not, they feel cheated. We had a theoretically good idea which simply
didn’t work. In Die Walküre we had given them real fire to surround
Brünnhilde; in Siegfried when Siegfried goes through the wall of flame,
we had used the conventional flame made out of lights. Now at the end,
we had the idea of suggesting flame and then water by means of fabric.
During the first part of the Immolation Scene, chorus members and
non-singing actors made a great pyre of Ring props. Brünnhilde, at the
crucial moment, threw an artificial torch on the pyre. Movement artists
then rushed out wrapping her and the pyre in red cloth as though it were
burning, à la artist Christo. Again, lack of rehearsal killed us. If
this could have worked, and I’m not sure about that, it would have taken
two or three whole rehearsal days to make it right. We gave up on doing
the water with a blue wrap when the Rhine overflowed and simply
reintroduced from the flies the huge blue “Rhine” from Das Rheingold.
That worked, but the red material looked like red strips of cloth being
run around a soprano by movement artists as she stood in the midst of a
pile of props. No matter how marvelously Ms. Kelm sang the Immolation,
the audience hated what happened afterwards. They manifested their
displeasure by copious booing, and a lot of cheering for the singers. In
one great moment someone threw flowers and someone else some tomatoes at
Rochaix. He always has said that he missed his big chance. He should
have bitten into a tomato and smelled the flowers.
In the letters afterwards, there were many pouring out invective,
violent diatribes, largely against me as the person behind what the
writers considered an outrage. One of the major charges, often repeated,
was one I treasured: “You forced us,” they said, “to pay attention to
the stage. We couldn’t sit back, close our eyes, and dream to the
music.” Imagine what Wagner, the composer of all composers who believed
in his words and his message would have said to that! But there were
many positive letters and reviews that acknowledged that we had created
something totally new to America and that, with all its faults, this
Ring was an important moment in American opera. I was scared about the
future, but those supportive letters meant more to me than I can ever
say. I answered all 300 of them, about 150 of each variety.